Feel free to leave a comment or greeting at the bottom of this page.
My PGP public key ID is 0x2F0E92637366A6A9, expand for key:
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Comment: Valid from:	2023-04-03 12:44
Comment: Type:	4,096-bit RSA (secret key available)
Comment: Usage:	Signing, Encryption, Certifying User-IDs
Comment: Fingerprint:	34D49230690769512E0054832F0E92637366A6A9

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=Ike+
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----



My Talk Archives:
Archive-01 ~ Archive-02 ~ Archive-03
Archive-04 ~ Archive-05 ~ Archive-06
Archive-07 ~ Archive-08 ~ Archive-09
Archive-10 ~ Archive-11 ~ Archive-12
Archive-13 ~ Archive-14 ~ Archive-15
Archive-16 ~ Archive-17 ~ Archive-18
Archive-19 ~ Archive-20 ~ Archive-21
Archive-22 ~ Archive-23 ~ Archive-24
Archive-25 ~ Archive-26 ~ Archive-27
Archive-28 ~ Archive-29 ~ Archive-30
Archive-31 ~ Archive-32 ~ Archive-33
Archive-34 ~ Archive-35 ~ Archive-36
Archive-37 ~ Archive-38 ~ Archive-39
Archive-40 ~ Archive-41 ~ Archive-42
Archive-43 ~ Archive-44 ~ Archive-45

You are amazing Edit

I just looked at the history of Candidates/Guide, and it struck me just how much work you do behind the scenes to make Wikipedia happen. So, take this:

  All Around Amazing Barnstar
For being quietly amazing. SilkTork (talk) 18:53, 23 November 2022 (UTC))Reply[reply]

Pronunciation Edit

Hi xaosflux - I was communicating with another editor, and your name came up in reference to something we wouldn't need to do because you'd done it. However, this was overshadowed by a far more crucial issue: that we had each been confidently sure we knew how to pronounce your name since we'd been editing Wikipedia, and our two ways were different. So, tl;dr: how do you pronounce your username? Nosebagbear (talk) 23:39, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Nosebagbear I think this is the right markup: /ˈzeɪ.as.flʌks/. I'm not super picky since I rarely hear it aloud! — xaosflux Talk 23:55, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
(c.f. testwiki:User talk:Xaosflux/phonos). — xaosflux Talk 23:57, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I didn't suspect three syllables. It was always just two in my head. SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:04, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@SmokeyJoe think back in the day I derived it from the words "chaos" and "flux", and may have been inspired by the animated series Æon Flux. I've been called "Zous" by some. — xaosflux Talk 01:08, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Don't worry about it, Joe. As a WP:Talk page stalker here, I thought it was just using the "X" for a Greek Chi and have always pronounced it as "Chaos Flux" in my head. TIL. VanIsaac, GHTV contWpWS 01:49, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
(That was my method, too, @Vanisaac!) :) Nosebagbear (talk) 10:09, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Once we get the phonos extension installed, maybe we can make a new "hear my username" userbox! — xaosflux Talk 11:15, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

8TV (Malaysian TV network) needs to be protected from unregistered users Edit

Hello there. I wanted to tell and concern about this. 8TV (Malaysian TV network) is suffering from vandalism and needs to be protected from the unregistered users because of the false information/gibberish into pages. There's no news about ceasing it's operation and it is proven to be false or just fake news. GlorysiaMelodyYT (talk) 10:16, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oh yeah, don't forget about 8FM, it is also suffered from vandalism before I undo it. GlorysiaMelodyYT (talk) 10:19, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Third one: List of programmes broadcast by 8TV (Malaysian TV network) were also got hit, I trying to stop the vandalism but the unregistered users won't stop spreading fake news. GlorysiaMelodyYT (talk) 10:30, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@GlorysiaMelodyYT Hello, to request a page be protected please post at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 11:14, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2022-50 Edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:33, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"Admins can do CSS" Edit

What do you mean by that? As far as I can tell only interface admins have the right to implement my request because it requires editing CSS in someone else ("User:UBX")'s userspace, which uses the editusercss right, which per Special:ListGroupRights only iadmins have. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:44, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Pppery yes, the target of that probably should have been the userpage, not the template - it was showing up on the wrong report, looks like the entire thing has been speedily deleted now though so nothing to do. — xaosflux Talk 17:46, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2022-51 Edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:58, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

2FA security key Edit

Hi - do you think this would be useful for my Google authenticator? Just in case? Don't want to loose access![11] Thanks. Doug Weller talk 15:55, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have two Yubikey 5's I use. -- Avi (talk) 16:11, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Avraham any idea what the difference is between the cheaper one that I linked and the one that you have? Thanks Doug Weller talk 16:30, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
See https://www.reddit.com/r/yubikey/comments/adzfqb/yubco_security_key_nfc_vs_yubikey_5_nfc/. The 5 has more methods. You could put GPG keys on it, for example. Or you could use the YubiAuth App with the key for TOTP (like Authy or Google Authenticator). -- Avi (talk) 11:38, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Doug Weller I don't recommend it here. From what I see that would mean you'd convert your 2FA from TOTP to WebAuthn; WMF has even less support for WebAuthn than for it's almost non-existent TOTP support system. There is currently no self-service recovery for WebAuthn failures. I use TOTP, and set it up on 2 devices, that way if one device fails I still have it on the other. The easiest way to do this is to register them both at the same time (turn off TOTP and set it up again). Additionally, ensuring that you safely store your scratch codes for TOTP is important. If your authentication device fails it can take up to 2 scratch codes to turn off 2FA until you can re-enroll. I have used some of the hardware keys with other systems, but they are ones where I register my real-world identity to them and have various built-in recovery mechanisms. — xaosflux Talk 17:07, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I have two keys that I use for my FIDO2, including Wikipedia, and they work fine. But I have two in case I lose one. That's the downside of the increased security of a physical device: no virtual back door. I consider that a feature, not a bug. -- Avi (talk) 11:40, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks. I have my codes. It’s on my android phone so unless that dies before I replace it I can transfer it to a new phone. Doug Weller talk 17:10, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Doug Weller if you have a secure computer, you could also install a software TOTP client. It won't help in the "your computer was taken over" type of attack, but still provides multifactor security from external cracking. — xaosflux Talk 17:13, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
good idea I can add Google Authenticatior to Chrome.. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 17:19, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

2FA - 2 devices, 2 different OSs Edit

Hello, Xaosflux! I wanted to write a question here but I got a notice saying it didn't get many watchers so I thought about asking you personally given that you had answered quite some questions there. (The question above me is also about 2FA. Strange coincidence...)
I use a PC and a laptop to edit Wikipedia. The PC uses Windows and the laptop is on Linux. I want to activate the 2 factor authorization but I'm not sure as to what would be the best way to act on this case. Do I really have to get 2 different groups of scratch codes by 2 different programs? Is there "a better way"? Sorry if I'm not clear. I'm a bit confused by the whole 2FA thing. — Klein Muçi (talk) 12:43, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Klein Muçi 2FA isn't related to the devices that you use to log on. 2FA (sticking to the TOTP model here) requires an authenticator, which is software that can take an initial secret seed, the time of day, and output a short-lived code. Most people that use our TOTP use a smartphone app as their authenticator. When you activate 2FA it will give you your initial registration seed, at that point you can use that seed to register multiple authentication devices (I use a software application on a trusted computer, and a software application on a smartphone). You shouldn't store that seed as it could be used to impersonate you. During registration you will get a set of scratch codes. These are attached to your account, not to your authenticator or any computer you log on to. They should be used only in the even of a broken authenticator, and only to unenroll from 2FA until you can set it up again. Does that answer your questions? — xaosflux Talk 14:06, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
To be 100% clear, you can never have "2 different groups of scratch codes"; the only way to get scratch codes is to activate 2FA, and the only way to get another set is to deactivate it (invalidating the old scratch codes) and reactivate it. There is not currently support to register multiple TOTP instances with different seeds and scratches. — xaosflux Talk 14:10, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
During registration you will get a set of scratch codes. These are attached to your account, not to your authenticator or any computer you log on to.
Aha! Okay then. That was my dilemma. Thank you! :)) — Klein Muçi (talk) 16:01, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Seasons Greetings Edit

  Whatever you celebrate at this time of year, whether it's Christmas or some other festival, I hope you and those close to you have a happy, restful time! Have fun, Donner60 (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)}} Reply[reply]  

Donner60 (talk) 01:41, 24 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Merry Christmas! Edit

Hello, Xaosflux! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:15, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Spread the WikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}}

Happy New Year, Xaosflux! Edit

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 21:50, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy New Year! Edit

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:14, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Inactivity criterion 2 desysop notifications Edit

Hi xaosflux. It would be best to use {{inactive admin 2}} instead of {{inactive admin}}. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:13, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@JJMC89 thanks, good thing I'm doing these in batches! — xaosflux Talk 02:17, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A barnstar for you! Edit

  The Admin's Barnstar
You deserve this barnstar because of your hard work at Wikipedia:Inactive administrators/2023. Great work! Sarrail (talk) 03:31, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
aand...

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Sarrail (talk) 03:34, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Signpost: 1 January 2023 Edit

Happy New Year Edit

Wishing you a year filled with prosperity, happiness, and good health. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 12:23, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy New Year, Xaosflux! Edit

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Moops T 17:07, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Suspension of my administrative permissions Edit

Thank you for notifying me on my user talk page that my admin permissions have been suspended due to inactivity. Sadly, I have been too busy with other projects to do much Wikipedia editing in recent years. I still think Wikipedia is a great resource and a shining example of volunteer collaboration. Best wishes and Happy New Year.

--Sheldon Rampton Sheldon Rampton (talk) 19:42, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – January 2023 Edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).

  Administrator changes

 
  Stephen
 

  Interface administrator changes

  Nihiltres

  Guideline and policy news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • Voting for the Sound Logo has closed and the winner is expected to be announced February to April 2023.
  • Tech tip: You can view information about IP addresses in a centralised location using bullseye which won the Newcomer award in the recent Coolest Tool Awards.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bureaucrat chat - invitation to participate Edit

The RfA for MB has gone to a bureaucrat chat. Please join in the discussion. Primefac (talk) 15:02, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re: License & wiki footer Edit

Just a ping that I answered you at: https://en-wiki.kfd.me/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Text_of_the_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License&diff=1132579220&oldid=1132570362&diffmode=source although commenting on your discussion because we probably should move the discussion somewhere more centralized -so others can participate, too-, either on wiki or on Phabricator. :-) I pinged legal already and I am waiting for their advice, too on how flexible we can be. Regards, and thank you for answering! --JCrespo (WMF) (talk) 15:17, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@JCrespo (WMF) thanks; are there other wikitext pages that are being monitored that may also need to be dealt with similarly? — xaosflux Talk 15:20, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Let me check the code and will get back to you. --JCrespo (WMF) (talk) 15:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
As far as Mediawiki-content controlled pages for enwiki, I found only 2: check_legal_html!https://en-wiki.kfd.me/wiki/Main_Page and check_legal_html!https://en-wiki.kfd.me/wiki/Main_Page, and then wikibooks, aside. Only contents in MediaWiki:Wikimedia-copyright are checked(and the main page redirect should not be moved without also updating that code)- but after rendering into the Main page. We should wait for legal to answer first, maybe the check is not needed anymore in the current form. Or maybe we could change the alert to just check the links exist and that would give you more flexibility, rather than forcing you to notify us every time. --JCrespo (WMF) (talk) 15:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@JCrespo (WMF) thanks, this seems somewhat useless if MediaWiki:Wikimedia-copyright being the same is enough, as it links to the actual license external from that page! (Either a local copy such as we have at Wikipedia:Text of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - and could just edit. Or completely outside of our control such as when it links to [12] and could be changed or corrupted there. — xaosflux Talk 15:43, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I don't necessarily always understand the lawyer's requests, but I am sure to follow their advice to avoid legal problems. :-) My guess is that at some point in the past, the footer disappeared due to a software bug/html rendering issue and that could have had legal consequences for us. I believe things like the license and the privacy policy are important enough to merit alerting over not having them! I don't know the details- what I know is that we (system administrators) get an alert when the footer is edited and want to make that better for us, in the most reasonable manner possible! Our lawyers understand the wiki, and they will know the best way to keep things editable while minimizing risk, I have no doubt- this is not about closing up things! --JCrespo (WMF) (talk) 15:52, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
In any case, removing the alerts is one of the possible outcomes indeed, in which case you wouldn't be affected at all. --JCrespo (WMF) (talk) 16:01, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I gave you a personal thank you, in addition to mentioning it publicly on the ticket, for your role giving feedback on how to improve this particular legal check. Regards. --JCrespo (WMF) (talk) 17:26, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-02 Edit

MediaWiki message delivery 01:06, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Add topic Edit

Hi! When did you start to become an admin MintyEditor (talk) 05:47, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In 2006. — xaosflux Talk 11:06, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment Edit

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Andrew Tate on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard Accidental revert Edit

My apology for reverting your edit as it had nothing to do with your change. I was trying to select the "diff" link on a page in my watchlist and I accidentally clicked the "revert" link on your edit instead. I undid the revert as soon as I realized what I had done. RedWolf (talk) 23:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No worries, accidents happen. Cheers! — xaosflux Talk 23:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Signpost: 16 January 2023 Edit

Tech News: 2023-03 Edit

MediaWiki message delivery 01:08, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The best dude 2023 Edit

I don't believe you actually processed the unblock for The best dude 2023. :) -- Yamla (talk) 16:15, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Yamla if I didn't make the block, I wouldn't have, and I don't have high hopes but figured a little WP:ROPE will tell. — xaosflux Talk 16:17, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sorry, I meant I believe that user is still blocked. You are of course welcome to lift the block, I just think you haven't done that yet. --Yamla (talk) 16:18, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Yamla oooooooo, thanks for that - done. — xaosflux Talk 16:20, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Fingers crossed this person justifies your good faith in them. Have a great day! --Yamla (talk) 16:21, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I had meant to, but collided with my rename. — xaosflux Talk 16:21, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not so weird flex Edit

Hello, Xaosflux! I find myself in need of your technical advice. I was updating the SqWiki main page some days ago when I noticed that it doesn't render nice on mobile. Then I tried seeing what happened with EnWiki (I'm not an avid mobile wikiuser myself so I hadn't concentrated on such details before) and there I saw that the whole page layout changed, its "blocks" being rearranged in a very optimized column manner. Trying to replicate the same effect, I was searching around the source code to see what made this happen and eventually I learned about the existence of flexing in CSS. Given that I just learned about it I haven't been able to achieve much yet. Can you help me make SqWiki's main page behave in a similar manner as EnWiki's does in regard to that? - Klein Muçi (talk) 07:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Klein Muçi sorry, I don't have the cycles to work on that right now. You can try asking for a volunteer over at WP:VPT. — xaosflux Talk 10:30, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It's okay. Apparently the problem is far more complex than just using Display:Flex as I was hoping when I wrote that. Experimented a bit around. Maybe it should wait a bit. — Klein Muçi (talk) 13:33, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

all images on wikipedia do not work Edit

Hi for some all images on wikipedia do not work please help me fix it thank you The best dude 2023 (talk) 16:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@The best dude 2023 what happens if you try to load an image directly, such as by this link? — xaosflux Talk 16:47, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It will not load at all... The best dude 2023 (talk) 14:55, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Not sure, sounds like a problem on your client - possibly with an extension. Try another browser. — xaosflux Talk 15:03, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I use safari The best dude 2023 (talk) 15:37, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@The best dude 2023 yes, try another browser, ensure it is a current release, ensure your operating system has current TLS/SSL support. Nothing else I can really do for you from here; you can try asking over at commons:Commons:Village pump/Technical. — xaosflux Talk 15:40, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It loaded but it says Restricted Site The best dude 2023 (talk) 15:52, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No idea, sounds like something on your network in your browser; if you can verify that the "restricted site" message is coming from a WMF server (not just something your browser generated) you can open a bug report here. — xaosflux Talk 15:55, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I do work for a organization so maybe they blocked it The best dude 2023 (talk) 15:58, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That happens, sometimes it isn't a direct block, but an extension that is blocking it too - if you don't control your network and computer you should start by contacting your org helpdesk. — xaosflux Talk 16:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ok thank you for your help The best dude 2023 (talk) 19:14, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sorry for wasting your time. The best dude 2023 (talk) 16:10, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Account hacked Edit

Hi I am reporting a hacked account The best dude 2023 (talk) 15:17, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Are you saying your account was hacked? Please review WP:COMPROMISED. --Yamla (talk) 15:21, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No my friend got hacked The best dude 2023 (talk) 15:23, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Please provide the account name and evidence of this so we can block the compromised account. --Yamla (talk) 15:25, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
And do so at WP:ANI, not here. — xaosflux Talk 15:31, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sorry but the account name is Dummy boy 2.0
and here is evidence "Ha ha ha i hacked this account no one can stop now lol lol lol" The best dude 2023 (talk) 15:35, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@The best dude 2023 see above, post this at WP:ANI. — xaosflux Talk 15:38, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ok i did it sorry The best dude 2023 (talk) 15:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
OP blocked as a vandal sock. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:28, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-04 Edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:44, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OMG Edit

You are the man. (ref this Special:Diff/1135488182) Thank you very much, for everything you do and thank you very much for the things you've helped me with.   - FlightTime (open channel) 00:21, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just saying :P - FlightTime (open channel) 00:23, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reply as opposed to Edit Edit

In other words, Reply works properly, but Edit is totally screwed up. Milkunderwood (talk) 02:39, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]Reply[reply]

When you go to that preferences page, which skin is currently selected? — xaosflux Talk 12:43, 28 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Frankly, I don't know -- I just accepted all the defaults. I use WP just to look up information, and edit only to the extent of making small corrections to obvious spelling or grammatical problems. I've never bothered to figure out the jargon here, such as "skins". In the meantime, Edit seems to work more or less properly, except when it doesn't, jumping to top of page instead of to the correct Section.
(This is a copy/paste from our original discussion, to your talkpage. I very much appreciate your help and interest, but I'm another distressed user who wishes that far better than "good enough" had been left alone. If there were a way for users to choose the look and feel of WP as it used to be, I'd definitely be there instead.) Milkunderwood (talk) 10:04, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oh, and also, both times I've gone to Preferences, the Save button has been grayed out. Milkunderwood (talk) 10:09, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The save button will always be greyed out until you make a change. I asked you to go there and look so I could try to guide you, but you never answered. If you want to reset all your options to the current default, you can go to these two pages and confirm: Special:Preferences/reset / Special:GlobalPreferences/reset. Note, there is no way to "undo" a preference reset. — xaosflux Talk 11:16, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You may first want to actually check that Skin setting. It is right at the top of the page here: Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-rendering, it says "Skin" and only one can be selected at a time. The new default is "Vector (2022)", the older default that you may want to try is "Vector legacy (2010)". — xaosflux Talk 11:18, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hey, it works! Thank you! I never understood what all that gobbledygook was, other than giving me a headache. (If I didn't reply, I don't live on WP, but just visit when I need to. Most questions I might ask are never responded to.) Milkunderwood (talk) 16:15, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Good to hear you are fixed! — xaosflux Talk 20:48, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oh, I am so happy now! Thank you again! Milkunderwood (talk) 00:23, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WP:CBAN Edit

Hi, there's a community ban discussion going on at WP:AN#User:Doug Coldwell. Just before the votes, it says:

Per WP:CBAN, "discussions may be organized via a template to distinguish comments by involved and uninvolved editors". Please declare prior involvement and post in the "Involved" section only if you were previously involved.

I looked at the policy and saw no guidance on what makes an editor "involved". I was hoping you might know how this works, in practice if not policy. Also, how does an "involved" editor's vote compare to an "uninvolved" editor's vote when the discussion is closed? The whole thing seems pretty odd to me, but I don't generally vote - or even pay that much attention to - these discussions. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:32, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Bbb23 creating such a section doesn't appear to be required by policy, in general declaring involvement is beneficial so this may just make it easier. — xaosflux Talk 20:53, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Beneficial to whom? Other editors? The closer? I still don't get it, but it's not important, thanks for your reply.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:02, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Bbb23 the purpose of the CBAN is to determine if the community should ban someone - so if someone is in a personal dispute with the subject they may still have something to contribute but could be biased, and the closer could take that in to consideration. It is likely a short way to help someone just call that out instead of starting threaded comments about the other participants possible involvements. I don't think it is used often like that. — xaosflux Talk 21:09, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-05 Edit

MediaWiki message delivery 00:04, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Minor template space cleanup Edit

Do you have plans for {{Uw-ublock-nonsense/doc}}? It looks like the parent template uses shared documentation. If some random editor had created it, I would TFD it, but I figure that you either have plans for it or know how to use CSD G7. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Jonesey95 deleted. — xaosflux Talk 17:55, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2023 Edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The Vector 2022 skin has become the default for desktop users of the English Wikipedia.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • Voting in the 2023 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
  • Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
  • Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:38, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Verified account Edit

@Xaosflux Hello, can you give me a verified account flag? GlazaLubvi (talk) 21:20, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Replied on your talk. — xaosflux Talk 21:32, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Signpost: 4 February 2023 Edit

Tech News: 2023-06 Edit

MediaWiki message delivery 10:19, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-07 Edit

MediaWiki message delivery 01:47, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment Edit

 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scotland on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:31, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Surprise!!! Edit

Hi, Xaosflux. I was somewhat surprised, to say the least, to receive a notification that The Night Watch is my new mentor, because you have removed Kaleeb18 from mentorship. 🤔 JBW (talk) 17:18, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@JBW: you must be opted-in to being a mentee - probably from one of the early experiments, @Kaleeb18: was your prior mentor who has retired from WP; I removed them as a mentor so that people sending "ask my mentor" questions wouldn't go to him anymore, when this happened all of his prior mentees were pseduorandomly assigned to new mentors. You probably don't need mentoring at this point in your wiki career :) As an admin, I think you can claim yourself as a mentee at Special:ClaimMentee if you want to stay opted-in, but avoid that sort of thing in the future, or you can always poke The Night Watch and ask for some suggestions on articles to edit ;) — xaosflux Talk 17:43, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I have no memory whatever of opting in to be a mentee, and if I did ever opt in then I certainly never followed that up and actually became a mentee. Perhaps, however, I should take it up now: there may be a benefit of advice from someone newer, with a fresh outlook, instead of the jaded and worn-out approach that I have probably fallen into. 🥱 JBW (talk) 18:40, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@JBW: there is also a chance that you got hit with phab:T301981. Some people that never opted in get a notification anyway when their mentor changes (everyone has a mentor, but for most established users they are never used for anything). I'll keep following up on that ticket to avoid noise for people that don't need it. You are welcome to use the feature if you want! — xaosflux Talk 20:45, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
"Everyone has a mentor"? Really? Why? JBW (talk) 20:49, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@JBW it is just the way the system got initiated, something about not having null entries in the database tables. Most existing users never got opted-in, so it doesn't do anything - except for now possibly give people annoying notifications until that gets fixed! — xaosflux Talk 22:07, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
For me, the notification was not at all annoying, in fact I found it more amusing than anything else. Anyway, thanks for the explanation. JBW (talk) 08:25, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mentoring still exists on Wikipedia? I thought all those old processes went inactive years ago. That's nice to know. I always thought that peer mentoring was a good concept. - jc37 19:11, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Jc37 the old "mentoring" process (Wikipedia:Mentorship) sort of is still around, the new process that this log event was related to is primary targeted at brand new editors and is described at Wikipedia:Growth Team features. — xaosflux Talk 20:43, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Interesting! Thank you for the information. Learn something new every day  : ) - jc37 03:37, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Signpost: 20 February 2023 Edit

Tech News: 2023-08 Edit

MediaWiki message delivery 01:56, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment Edit

 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please remove Wikibreak Enforcer Edit

My username is IntegerSequences. I added the code of Wikibreak Enforcer to my common.js page but later found that it was a mistake but only me and interface admins can edit that page. Please help! 10:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  Donexaosflux Talk 10:33, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks. IntegerSequences (talk | contribs) 12:04, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You mistyped Edit

Your userpage says User Boxen instead of Userboxes, it must have 1 capital and no typos, also you must join the two words UrSUS529 (talk) 17:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion, I like it how it is. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 17:28, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
UrSUS529, this is an inside joke for computer nerds from the old days of computing. The joke is that "oxen" is the plural of "ox", so "boxen" should be the plural of "box". – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:56, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Really? I always thought it was a German thing. What do oxen have to do with computers? Or is it that computers were sometimes called boxes? Still, I like Xaosflux's answer - it's so polite.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:27, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, "Unix box" or "Linux box" is jargon, where "box" means "computer" or "server". The Jargon File says that "boxen" originated as an analog of "VAXen" (multiple VAX computers), which came from "oxen". It's just a jokey mapping of a morphological pattern onto a place where it does not belong. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:40, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I don't suppose they had cows in mind when they created the VAX acronym. My knowledge of Latin is not scholarly, but rather through my knowledge of French (vache), if I happen to think about it.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:02, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
See more language tips in this mirror of the jargon file! — xaosflux Talk 22:30, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Okay, that's fine UrSUS529 (talk) 17:17, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Interface message suggestion Edit

Hi Xaosflux! When I recently tried to move Draft:Pete Sutherland to Pete Sutherland (currently a redirect to a soap opera character), it gave me the normal error, as non-admins cannot overwrite a page. I'm about to submit a request to WP:RM#TR to usurp the title, but I noticed that the interface message does not point to it, or indeed even suggest that usurping is possible; it just says The page could not be moved, for the following reason: A redirect already exists at Pete Sutherland, and it cannot be deleted automatically. Please choose another name. Telling editors unilaterally to choose another name when sometimes usurping is the right course of action is bad advice (and reinforces systemic bias to the extent it gives precedence to older articles), so I think it should be changed. I couldn't find where that message is stored, as searching doesn't turn it up and I'm not able to add uselang=qqx to the URL in the middle of submitting. You tend to be knowledgeable about this area — would you be able to help me find and modify the message? Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}}talk 05:31, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Sdkb The common move move fails messages should be: MediaWiki:Cannotmove as the first line, followed by a "reason" such as MediaWiki:Articleexists or MediaWiki:Redirectexists. I think you hit the last one there. — xaosflux Talk 10:14, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That's it; thanks! Requested the edit there. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 22:51, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Open meeting for patrollers Edit

Hello, Xaosflux and friendly talk-page stalkers.

The mw:Editing team is starting a new project, mw:Edit check. They are particularly seeking the views of RecentChanges patrollers and other reviewers. One of the open questions is: When should the visual editor encourage people to add a citation?

The meeting will be this Friday, 3 March 2023. More information is available at mw:Editing team/Community Conversations#3 March 2023. I hope that you will be able to attend, but if you aren't, please consider leaving your advice to the team on the talk page. They would particularly value hearing about the citation standards at different Wikipedias, and also what you think the biggest problem is with the first edits made by new editors. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:21, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Xaosflux/Sandbox44 Edit

Hello, Xaosflux,

Your user page is showing up on the broken redirects page as a page to be deleted or fixed because, well, it is a broken redirect. But I see in the page history that it is a test edit. So, I'm unsure what to do here. We delete broken redirects or at least remove or correct them from the page they are on but we also don't generally mess around with user pages of editors who have as much experience and advanced privileges as you have. But these error pages get updated every 6 hours and until the page is either deleted or the content altered, it will keep showing up as an error that needs to be dealt with.

So, maybe you could finish up with your test or alter the content so that it links to an existing page before my mild OCD kicks in. Thank you! Liz Read! Talk! 21:05, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Liz blanked it for now, was a quick test for phab:T44899 - but any that need to stay live I'll drop on testwiki. — xaosflux Talk 21:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-09 Edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:45, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2023 Edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Congratulations on your election! I hope you find the work interesting. Liz Read! Talk! 03:33, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @Liz thank you, there is a lot to it, but there is a good team! — xaosflux Talk 11:29, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the re-welcome :) Edit

I was just archiving my old talk page and noticed you had welcomed me back. Thank you! —siroχo 05:42, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-10 Edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Signpost: 9 March 2023 Edit

Tech News: 2023-11 Edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:18, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Block an account from creating accounts? Edit

Hello, Xaosflux! Is there a way one can block an account from creating other multiple accounts? If you check w:sq:Speciale:Log/newusers and search the page for Të paret e Llapit you'll see that they have wrongly created 4 new accounts now, maybe attempting to write an article (they've also tried using their user page as an article page). Any function that can block this functionality from an account? - Klein Muçi (talk) 10:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Klein Muçi yes, see this example block (just do partial, and only select creating accounts. There are of course many many many ways around that (including just logging out). — xaosflux Talk 13:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Can you give me temporary admin access on TestWiki for 1 week so I can unblock and reblock your 2nd account and thus learn what option to use for that? We have the interface badly translated in Albanian in such a way that most options don't make any sense for us. I need to retranslate them. — Klein Muçi (talk) 13:35, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Klein Muçi since youre a prod sysop it can be indefinite there :D And block your own account :D — xaosflux Talk 13:44, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks a lot! Small curiosity: I'm not familiar with the expression "prod sysop". What exactly does prod stand for? — Klein Muçi (talk) 02:44, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Klein Muçi sorry for the jargon, "prod" = "production". We generally will give any permeant sysop of a production public wiki admin access on testwiki to test things. — xaosflux Talk 09:26, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oh, okay. That's what I was thinking but I couldn't find the definition anywhere explained. Do these rules apply to the interface admin role as well? I was thinking that maybe testing and localizing new gadgets there before getting them to run on SqWiki would be a good thing but currently I'm not working with any gadgets. — Klein Muçi (talk) 15:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Klein Muçi basically yup, if you need it there feel free to ping me. We generally do remove it from people not actively using it after a while. The one sort of gadget test we don't normally like much of on testwiki is default gadgets, so if your gadget is for logged-out-users, you can test it QUICKLY, then turn it right off (otherwise it can interfere with lots of other people's tests). If it is a gadget for users (even if you will make it default elsewhere) - don't make it default, and just turn it on to test it (and once done, delete it). — xaosflux Talk 15:09, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you for information! — Klein Muçi (talk) 15:18, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

LOL OMG Edit

Thank you so much, I have no idea why I couldn't figure this out, I'm just no good on working in variables. I will use this, if you don't mind :P - FlightTime (open channel) 22:31, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Think I'm done messing around with it now, have fun! — xaosflux Talk 22:34, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you for all you do, you're a legit project gem. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 22:41, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Question for edit filter manager Edit

Hi @Xaosflux

While responding to Wikipedia:Edit_filter/False_positives, I came across Abuse Filter 225 which looked like it missed something. After putting it in Regex it looked like !summary rlike ("/\* .*" + match + ".* \*/") misses something. Would !summary rlike ("\/\* .*" + match + ".* \*\/") fix it? 1AmNobody24 (talk) 09:26, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@1AmNobody24 which FP item is that regarding? (Suggest moving this to WP:EFN with exact examples). — xaosflux Talk 10:01, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Xaosflux I found it while I was on this, but that one was a different problem. Since it isn't really connected with a FP i wasn't sure if WP:EFN is the right place for it. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 10:07, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
EFN is fine for any filters you think have an error, especially if you have an example and a proposed fix - worse case nothing happens :) — xaosflux Talk 10:17, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Got it I'll take it there then.   Thanks for the fast replies. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 10:24, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@1AmNobody24 (also I don't want it to get lost here - I won't have time to work on that for a couple days, but someone else may!) — xaosflux Talk 12:38, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Xaosflux I got it already sorted out at WP:EFN. The / was used as text for detecting the automatic summary not as a delimiter that has to be escaped, but escaping it would still work, so it makes no difference if changed or not. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 12:44, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Signpost: 20 March 2023 Edit

Barning Edit

  The Special Barnstar
Thanks for your work in the userbox! Thinker78 (talk) 20:56, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-12 Edit

MediaWiki message delivery 01:24, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Multi-level transclusion Edit

Hello, Xaos! Can you help me solve something in SqWiki? This is our template for creating RFAs: Link. It works fine in itself (recent example) but look what happens when you transclude it on the main page where people are expected to see RFAs: Link. The problem is with {{User|{{SUBPAGENAME}}}}. I think I should be using {{safesubst}} somewhere over there to solve it but I'm not sure where exactly. - Klein Muçi (talk) 19:51, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Klein Muçi I think I understand what you want, is it this: When someone makes a new application (such as it would appear in this link) all those SUBPAGE values should be subst'd in on to the new page they are creating? — xaosflux Talk 20:20, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I suppose so. I was talking only about the first SUBPAGE value because that is what is bringing problems but maybe all of them should be subst'd. — Klein Muçi (talk) 20:23, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Klein Muçi yup, do them all. QND example link - just wrap them in something like I did here: w:sq:Përdoruesi:Xaosflux/sandbox/2, that's what we usually do. — xaosflux Talk 20:27, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you, that solved it. — Klein Muçi (talk) 21:11, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-13 Edit

MediaWiki message delivery 01:12, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Edit

I guess I finally figured this out 2600:1702:1F8D:1010:681:1CFE:77F4:2250 (talk) 13:38, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Categories Edit

Hello, Xaosflux!

I was wondering if you could provide some practical advice on matters related to categories. My homewiki has always been a mess in regard to categories. Now we're trying to put our attention to that area a bit. Any advice on how to start attending to the category-tree so we can provide a well-structure hierarchy? From what I've seen, we've started dealing from the branches: Users translate articles and with them, they create the missing categories (and sometimes their parent categories) they find on EnWiki on those articles. This makes maintenance/technical categories almost non-existent when compared with their content homologues.

Bonus question: Why can't we have redirects work on category pages? I was thinking of asking about such a thing in the technical wishlist but I thought that it looked as a too obvious request so I thought that maybe there must be a reason why that doesn't exist. — Klein Muçi (talk) 14:05, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Klein Muçi for the second part, phab:T5311 is ~20 years old, it may never happen for a pile of reasons. For the first part, there are lots of philosophies, and it depends what your community wants. Categories do not need to be a "tree" (and they seldom only are) - they are more of a "web". For example take the article, w:sq:Banka_e_Shqipërisë, it is in w:sq:Kategoria:Ekonomi - is that useful? Who is it useful to? Categories may be used in different ways by different people (editors vs readers for example). In general, I think that very large categories are not useful for readers. For example our Category:Scientists would be unwieldy if it was fully populated, but with only 54 entries w:sq:Kategoria:Shkencëtarë could still be useful for your readers. Wikipedia:Categorization contains the guidelines that we use here on enwiki. — xaosflux Talk 14:21, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, I've read those guidelines. I just don't know how I would start applying them practically. I mean, I was searching for a way I can "supervise from the top" the web-creating process, if that makes any sense. Utilizing tools and mass-changes. Creating a standard. Because now everyone just creates the categories needed for their article and as you said everyone is using different philosophies.

That's a bit sad to read. Some main reasons why that cannot happen? — Klein Muçi (talk) 15:14, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
On the concept, a community discussion about what you want and what you don't want is where to start. Good background would be any deletion or merge discussions you may have had about categories in the page. Do you want your category pages to contain their own content as well, or not (such as an overview of the topic) - do you want them to just be for navigation, or also for content?
On the redirects, one of the primary reasons is that categories are primarily managed by wikitext on the screen, and what to do if a category is moved (and how to do it), especially during category splits or merges. — xaosflux Talk 15:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm sorry but I fail to understand what you mean about redirects. :/ — Klein Muçi (talk) 16:13, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Signpost: 03 April 2023 Edit

Tech News: 2023-14 Edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:38, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2023 Edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-15 Edit

MediaWiki message delivery 20:04, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not sure if Edit

Not sure if anyone saw this edit, but the bot still has the flag, so I'd guess not. Could you action? Izno (talk) 16:44, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Izno   Done, thanks for the note. — xaosflux Talk 18:10, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment Edit

 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:32, 13 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Help about a template problem Edit

Hello, Xaosflux! I find myself a bit confused as how to handle a certain situation.

If you look at sq:Marrëdhëniet e jashtme të Maqedonisë së Veriut, you'll see that there are some empty sections and some other strange behaviors in it. After a bit of investigation I found out that this was coming from {{Pb}}. In EnWiki PB=Paragraph break but in SqWiki PB=Përdorues i bllokuar (Blocked user).

If you search for Template:Pb in SqWiki you'll see that apparently that is a really old template we would use to notify users about their blocks. If you check its transclusions you'll see that it has been used less than 50 times in all these years. Now normally I want our Pb template to serve the same purpose as the one here. Most of our new articles are CX translations and for CX to work correctly it needs to have the same technical infrastructure in templates. The problem is that I don't know how to handle those ~40 old transclusions. I can use AWB for massediting but what change would I need to do exactly? - Klein Muçi (talk) 12:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Klein Muçi have you fixed one "manually" (diff?) If so I might be able to tell you what to put in AWB. — xaosflux Talk 16:55, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No, that's the problem: I don't know how to handle the situation. Should I just remove all those ~40 cases? Should I create another template and use that in those? Maybe I should just substitute the code there in those cases? A completely different solution? I don't know what would be the best choice in such situations dealing with these kinds of conflicts. — Klein Muçi (talk) 18:19, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Klein Muçi ah ok, so there are a few options. Yes you should remove those from those pages, as they certainly don't belong there. As far as exactly what to do, this will depend a bit on how your project standardizes style (or doesn't). It looks like you have w:sq:Stampa:Quote that you may convert things to, or you can just use plain wiki text, something like this. It really comes down to how much and what type of templates/wikitext/etc you want to be on your page sources. — xaosflux Talk 23:03, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello, Xaosflux! Sorry it took me so long to get back to this but I took a wiki-break and now I'm just starting to slowly ease myself in into work again. I tried converting them to quotes but the whole thing is a mess. Check the last post in here: w:sq:Përdoruesja diskutim:Rrjedha
Hitting Edit on it sends you to edit the template itself. I've come to the conclusion that I should remove them completely from the talk pages. Any idea how to quickly remove such sections with AWB? — Klein Muçi (talk) 09:59, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Klein Muçi maybe, send me a link of a diff of an edit that makes the change from broken to "fixed" made manually. — xaosflux Talk 10:17, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Përdoruesja diskutim:Rrjedha (Diff ~2550895) — Klein Muçi (talk) 10:22, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Klein Muçi OK so you want to:

  • Find everything in a {{Pb|...}}, plus any line breaks before it, plus any line breaks after it, plus any unordered list content following any of that
    • Delete all that

That seems overly complicated, are you sure? — xaosflux Talk 10:40, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, yes. I can always remove them manually if it seems too much for regex. We're talking about only 40 cases in total. I was expecting for something greedy like .* if you understand what I mean. Basically if that template is in a section all that section must go. — Klein Muçi (talk) 10:56, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Klein Muçi why are you trying to match unordered lists that happen to be following that template? Just matching the PB template and their content is one thing, but the second part gets complicated - how many levels of unordered lists are you also trying to capture? (What is the identifier to know when to stop including text?) To be clear, I'm asking about how you are also removing the text in that diff that starts with this: :Gjithashtu të hoqa edhe nga grupi i përd. — xaosflux Talk 11:01, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: even only the PB's would need to be manually reviewed, as the ending delimiter would be the }}, but you have to watch for cases where another template is inside of that template. — xaosflux Talk 11:02, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, I'm aware of that.
I'm matching the whole discussion. The template notifies one that they are blocked. Sometimes a discussion issues after that "Why was I blocked? Because you did this. No, I did not!" The whole section must be removed so maybe the delimiter would be ==, the starting point for the next section? — Klein Muçi (talk) 11:16, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Klein Muçi that's beyond what I normally do in AWB, you can ask over at Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/Tasks. For what it's worth this would likely be completely disapproved here: removing/replacing a broken template would always be fine - but just deleting user discussions as a side affect of a "template cleanup" would not be. Of course, how your project operates is up to your community, but I suggest you use a good edit summary so it doesn't appear you are trying bury discussion removals under the guise of template repair. — xaosflux Talk 13:10, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, I'm aware of that. That's why I tried finding a workaround but I was literally unable to find a solution for quite some days now so I'm going for the "good edit summary" way. :/ And no problem about AWB. I only said that after your initial suggestion. I can remove them manually if that is the only solution. - Klein Muçi (talk) 13:26, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-16 Edit

MediaWiki message delivery 01:53, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-17 Edit

MediaWiki message delivery 22:02, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment Edit

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Death and funeral of Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:31, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Signpost: 26 April 2023 Edit

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment Edit

 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-18 Edit

MediaWiki message delivery 01:43, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2023 Edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:23, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Blocked user restriction Edit

According to policy, when a user is blocked, the only page they can edit is their Talk page, but something came up on a blocked user's Talk page that I've never seen before, and I wanted to confirm the language in WP:OPTIONS: "Sitewide block will prevent the user from editing any page on Wikipedia with the exception of their own user talk page." (emphases in original). Can a blocked user change their Preferences? Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 11:28, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Bbb23 yes, sitewide blocked users can do things like change their own preferences and update their watchlist, however your quote above isn't wrong "... the user from editing any page..." - those type of actions are not considered "edits" and the targets of those actions are not "pages". Such a block would prevent pseudo prefernces such as a Special:MyPage/twinkleoptions.js from being updated. Does something else seem amiss? — xaosflux Talk 13:58, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
There are two ways I know of to change your watchlist. One is to "view and edit" it and the other "edit raw watchlist". Although both use the word "edit", it seems like the latter is more like editing a "page". Assuming a block user can do either, what is the point of all this? Why should they be permitted to do it? And although it may seem obvious to a technical user like you, I would favor clarifying the policy section, although I'm not sure how it should be worded.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:04, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Bbb23 I suppose the key part there is that neither of those are "pages". They are made up of system messages (which are on pages, that they can't edit) - and private data.
Blocking is a control that we use to stop disruption, preferences and watch lists can be used for adjusting ones "reading" experience, thus they are not prevented from being maintained during a block (There isn't an option to turn that on either in the current software).
We don't have a specific local "policy" about this, I think that section of the policy page is just meant to be informational, perhaps you could clarity what "edit"s are there by linking to Help:Editing.
You could also add a statement that clarifies that blocked users may still manage their user settings. There are lots of reasons that should still be allowed - for one blocks are not necessarily indefinite, and being able to do things like: change your notifications, mute abusive users, fix things like a bad signature that got you blocked in the first place, etc - should certainly be allowed.
If a user does manage to create special disruption via their private preferences (which the local admins wouldn't be able to detect and would generally have a sysadmin and a security task involved), their account can be locked to prevent them from logging in at all. — xaosflux Talk 14:37, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
What you're saying with respect to the why makes a lot of sense to me, thanks. As for clarifying the policy, I don't see where Help:Editing says anything that elaborates on what is a "page" and what is not (I skimmed it - it's awfully long). Would a steward lock a user just because of the private preference subterfuge? I always thought locks were generally available only for cross-wiki abuse. As an aside, I'm not sure what kind of private preference you're referring to.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:48, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Bbb23 such a lock would likely come from WMF T&S or a sysadmin, hypothetical example - a vulnerability exists that if someone loaded some exact combination of things in to their watchlist it caused system disruption, they may be locked for TOS violation (and people would be scrambling to patch the vulnerability), other times locks have been temporarily used were when someone was causing disruption by abusing the read API (things that are transparent to project admins).
mw:Help:Page is a redlink, the technical aspects of "what is a page" are here: mw:Manual:page table. In high-level "edit" is an action that create a revision to a "page". Things like: what your signature is, the contents of your watchlist, what your password is, etc - are certainly not 'pages' and don't have revision entries. — xaosflux Talk 15:04, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'd only add mw:Manual:page table to the blocking policy if I was really pissed and wanted to torture anyone who read it. :p --Bbb23 (talk) 15:09, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Bbb23 wrapping back to the start - I'm assuming there is some confusion of "why can a blocked account edit their preferences", it's just because they can. Perhaps adding "Blocked users are not prevented from managing their preferences." to the end of that information line would be your fix? — xaosflux Talk 15:15, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That would certainly be the simplest and smallest change. I don't like making any significant changes to policies without first obtaining a consensus. I'll think about it. Given this issue has never come up until now after all these years of blocking editors, maybe it's unnecessary to do anything. FYI, the issue came up because of one of your examples above (changing one's signature). In closing, I just wanted to say that I always learn a lot when having these kinds of discussions with you, and I appreciate it.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:24, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Bbb23 you are welcome, hope I helped without getting too technical; for the specific situation, think I've dealt with such a user once or twice. They had a non-compliant signature (something with templates or images I think), asked them to change it, they wouldn't, blocked them until they said they changed it, unblocked. FYI: phab:T306574 is a feature request that would allow admins to forcibly reset someone's signature. — xaosflux Talk 15:34, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You helped and got very technical (smiling), but if the answer is technical, what can you do? Besides, you do a good job of teaching. This user wasn't blocked for their signature, although editors complained about it. In case you're interested, see the block of ChiserYT and the post-block discussion about their sig.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:43, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • A bit off-topic. You changed the blocking policy on partial blocks to include a third option: "or from performing a specific set of actions". I looked at the block form, and I don't see any way to do that or even what you mean. Could you clarify?--Bbb23 (talk) 15:04, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @Bbb23 just reverted myself there, thought that feature was here, but isn't quite live yet. PBlocks will be able to be used against only specific types of actions soon (see example block here: testwiki:Special:Redirect/logid/360996). — xaosflux Talk 15:09, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Although I'm not a fan of partial blocks generally, that feature looks kinda cool.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:11, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @Bbb23 goal of that is just to give admins choices, I agree that often a pblock isn't very effective against a user that wants to be disruptive. — xaosflux Talk 15:17, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Signpost: 8 May 2023 Edit

Tech News: 2023-19 Edit

MediaWiki message delivery 00:34, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-20 Edit